Contract Review for Operating Businesses
When you sign a commercial contract, you convert a business arrangement into enforceable duties. Negotiators may focus on price, but scope, acceptance, renewal, remedies, data use, ownership, and exit rights often control the economic result after the parties sign.
You should review each agreement in the context of the transaction. A short agreement for a vendor that hosts customer data may present more risk than a longer agreement for an easily replaced supplier. Contract value, operational dependence, regulated data, intellectual property, payment exposure, and the cost of replacing the other party should determine the depth of review.
Review the Deal Before the Draft
Your attorney should know what each side promised before reviewing the paper. You should provide the pricing proposal, sales presentation, request for proposal, email commitments, implementation plan, and any earlier letter of intent. You should explain which deliverables prompted the transaction, which deadlines affect operations, and which failures would harm the business.
Once your attorney understands the deal, departures in the draft become easier to identify. A proposal may state a six-week implementation period while the contract contains no enforceable delivery commitment. A salesperson may promise data migration while the statement of work assigns migration to the customer. A negotiated price may apply for one year while incorporated online terms permit an earlier increase.
You should also identify the practical alternatives. A replaceable vendor presents a different termination risk from a platform that stores your records, controls your customer interface, or supports a required business process. Your negotiating priorities should reflect the consequences of delay, failure, and transition.
Assemble the Entire Contract
You should send every document that will govern the relationship. The signed agreement may incorporate an order form, statement of work, service level agreement, security exhibit, privacy addendum, acceptable use policy, online terms, pricing schedule, or product documentation. Reviewers can evaluate only the obligations contained in the documents they receive.
You should preserve the version of any online terms accepted at signing and determine whether the provider may revise it during the term. If the provider reserves that power, you should negotiate advance notice, limits on changes that reduce service or increase cost, and a termination right for a material adverse revision. Those terms should also state when a revision becomes effective.
You should establish an order of precedence for conflicting documents and state which document governs when an order form conflicts with the master agreement or when a statement of work conflicts with online terms. A merger clause should identify the complete agreement without erasing negotiated commitments that belong in an exhibit or amendment. Each negotiated exception should appear in a document that the precedence clause protects.
Confirm the Parties and the Signature Process
You should use each party's exact legal name and identify its entity type and jurisdiction. A trade name may identify the brand while leaving the contracting entity uncertain. You should also confirm that the signer acts for the entity and signs in a representative capacity, particularly when the draft contains a guaranty or another provision that could impose personal liability.
Texas recognizes electronic contracting under the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act when the parties agree to transact electronically. Section 322.007 provides that an electronic record or signature can't be denied legal effect solely because of its electronic form. You should preserve the final document, signature record, date, and evidence connecting each signer to the executed version.
Some agreements require a signed writing for additional reasons. Texas Business and Commerce Code Section 26.01 covers specified agreements, including a promise to answer for another person's debt, a sale of real estate, a lease longer than one year, and an agreement that can't be performed within one year. For a sale of goods priced at $500 or more, Section 2.201 generally requires a signed writing sufficient to show a contract and limits enforcement to the quantity stated.
Define Scope, Acceptance, and Change Control
You should describe the goods, services, deliverables, responsibilities, dependencies, schedule, and completion criteria. Terms such as reasonable support or standard implementation leave room for competing expectations. A usable scope identifies what the provider will deliver, what the customer must supply, and how a delay by one side affects the other's deadline.
You should state how you will test a deliverable, how long you have to inspect it, what constitutes rejection, and what the provider must do after rejection. Deemed acceptance by silence can convert an unfinished deliverable into an accepted one. If payment depends on a milestone, you should align acceptance, invoicing, and payment so each provision uses the same event.
You should require written approval for changes and identify who may request a change, who may approve price or schedule consequences, and when revised work may begin. For sales of goods, Section 2.209 recognizes a signed agreement that requires written modification, subject to the section's rules on waiver and the statute of frauds. Your operating team should follow the agreed process because email directions, purchase orders, and performance can affect the parties' rights even when the contract calls for a signed amendment.
Price, Invoicing, and Payment
You should confirm every component of price, including implementation fees, recurring charges, usage fees, minimum commitments, pass-through expenses, taxes, travel, support, and renewal increases. A pricing exhibit should state the unit, volume assumptions, measurement period, and source of usage data. If one party may change prices, you should specify timing, notice, limits, and the customer's termination right.
You should state the invoicing event, due date, required detail, dispute period, late charge, and available setoff. A deadline to dispute an invoice should preserve claims for latent defects, overcharges that require an audit, and indemnity obligations discovered after payment. The agreement should distinguish a billing objection from a release of underlying claims.
When parties exchange purchase orders and invoices, those documents may contain competing terms. For transactions in goods, Section 2.207 may permit contract formation even when an acceptance contains additional or different terms, unless the accepting party makes acceptance conditional on assent to those terms. You should use an order of precedence and train personnel who issue or accept forms because contract formation may occur through documents and conduct outside the master agreement.
Term, Renewal, and Exit Rights
You should state the initial term, renewal period, renewal procedure, and notice deadline. Texas has industry specific renewal requirements, so the governing statute depends on the agreement and the parties. Regardless of statutory coverage, you should calendar the contractual notice date when you sign and assign responsibility for the renewal decision.
You should address termination for convenience, uncured breach, repeated service failure, insolvency, illegality, security incidents, and changes that affect control or compliance. You should define the cure period and any breach that permits immediate termination. A long fixed term may be acceptable when the provider makes a substantial investment, while an operationally critical service may justify stronger performance and exit rights.
You should also state the consequences of termination, including final invoices, prepaid fees, transition assistance, data export, return of property, deletion, access to records, survival of licenses, and continued support during migration. A termination right provides little protection when the customer can't retrieve its data or replace the service before access ends. Transition duties should last long enough to complete an orderly migration.
Warranties, Service Levels, and Remedies
You should identify each promise about performance and determine whether the contract treats it as a warranty, covenant, service level, or condition. That classification can affect the remedy and the proof required. Technical specifications, implementation dates, legal compliance, professional standards, noninfringement, and authority to contract should appear in language that matches the negotiated promise.
You should define how the parties will measure service levels, including the system measured, exclusions, maintenance windows, reporting source, response time, restoration target, and remedy for repeated failure. Service credits may compensate for a short interruption, but a credit as the exclusive remedy can prevent recovery or termination after a failure with greater consequences. The customer should retain a termination right when repeated failures defeat the purpose of the service.
You should match each remedy to the breach. You may need correction, replacement, reperformance, refund, cover costs, termination, indemnity, injunctive relief, or damages. For goods, Article 2 supplies statutory remedies that the parties may modify within applicable limits, so sales contracts warrant a separate review of warranties, disclaimers, acceptance, revocation, and remedy restrictions.
Indemnity, Liability, and Insurance
Through indemnity clauses, the parties allocate specified claims and losses. You should identify the triggering conduct, protected parties, covered losses, duty to defend, control of counsel, settlement authority, notice procedure, and effect of a delayed notice. You should separate claims by a third party from direct claims between the contracting parties, because the procedure and risk differ.
You should apply the same precision to liability provisions by determining which claims fall within the cap, how the parties calculate that cap, which damages they exclude, and which obligations receive separate treatment. A cap based on fees may bear little relationship to exposure involving confidential information, personal data, infringement, physical injury, or a claim by a third party. Separate caps can distinguish ordinary contract claims from risks with a different economic scale.
You should confirm that required policies and endorsements cover the exposure allocated in the contract. Your review should identify policy types, limits, additional insured status, primary coverage, waiver of subrogation, duration, and evidence of coverage. When insurance affects the deal, you should review the policy or endorsement because a certificate provides only a summary of coverage.
Data, Security, and Intellectual Property
Any provider that receives personal data requires a review of permitted use, security, incident response, subprocessors, retention, deletion, and assistance with legal obligations. Texas Business and Commerce Code Section 541.104 requires a contract between a controller and processor to govern processing through specified terms. Our article on data processing agreements explains those requirements and the provisions businesses commonly negotiate around them.
You should match security terms to the data and service by stating applicable safeguards, access controls, testing, incident notification, cooperation, evidence of compliance, and responsibility for response costs. A promise to use reasonable security provides limited operational guidance unless the agreement identifies the relevant program, standard, or controls. Technical and legal personnel should review those terms together.
You should separate preexisting material, customer content, provider tools, deliverables, feedback, and new development. Paying for creative or technical services leaves copyright ownership with the author unless work for hire or assignment rules provide a different result. Under Section 204 of the Copyright Act, a transfer of copyright ownership, other than one by operation of law, requires a signed writing from the owner or the owner's authorized agent.
When the statutory requirements for work for hire may apply, you should include that language and a signed assignment when the customer must own the copyright interests. You should define each license by purpose, territory, term, media, exclusivity, transfer, sublicensing, and use after termination. If the provider incorporates open source software, third party content, or customer materials, you should allocate responsibility for authorization and compliance.
Assignment and Change of Control
You should distinguish a transfer of the agreement from subcontracting performance and determine whether either party may assign to an affiliate, in a merger, or with a sale of substantially all assets related to the agreement. Consent standards, advance notice, financial requirements, and continuing liability should match the business risk. An assignment clause should also address the effect of a prohibited transfer.
Ownership of the counterparty may affect the bargain even when no assignment occurs. A transaction can transfer control without transferring the agreement. You may want consent, termination, or notice rights if a competitor, sanctioned person, or financially weaker company acquires the other party.
You should identify functions the provider may delegate and obligations that apply to each subcontractor. The contracting provider should retain responsibility for performance. When a subcontractor receives personal data or confidential information, the downstream contract should impose the protections required by the primary agreement and applicable law.
Governing Law, Forum, and Disputes
A governing law clause specifies the law used to interpret the agreement, while a forum clause specifies where a dispute proceeds. You should review both. A Texas governing law clause paired with litigation in another state may impose travel, local counsel, and procedural burdens that the governing law clause doesn't address.
You should identify the disputes subject to arbitration, administrator, rules, location, number of arbitrators, selection process, interim relief, discovery, confidentiality, fees, and judgment procedure. You should choose arbitration only after considering those terms rather than assuming that it will always cost less or finish sooner. Court litigation may provide broader discovery, appellate review, joinder, and public precedent, while arbitration may provide a chosen decision maker and a private process.
Texas law limits how far parties may shorten claim periods. Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code Section 16.070 generally voids a contractual limitations period shorter than two years, subject to a statutory exemption for a qualifying purchase or sale of a business entity. Section 16.071 generally voids a contractual claim notice period shorter than 90 days, while providing different treatment for specified federal subcontracts and qualifying entity transactions. Sales contracts require a separate review because Section 2.725 permits the parties to reduce the four-year limitations period to no less than one year.
Contract Administration After Signing
You should store the signed agreement with every incorporated document and amendment. You should record the owner, term, renewal date, notice address, pricing adjustment, insurance deadline, reporting obligation, audit right, and required approval. Your accounting, operations, security, and sales teams should receive the provisions they must perform.
You should administer notice clauses according to their terms by identifying permitted delivery methods, required recipients, addresses, and the event that makes notice effective. An email to the business contact may fail to exercise a termination right when the agreement requires overnight delivery to a stated address with a copy to legal counsel. Your contract calendar should include every date that may require notice.
Your contract process should also preserve performance records. You should keep approvals, acceptance records, service reports, invoices, objections, change orders, security notices, and communications about breach. If a dispute develops, our articles on responding to demand letters and vendor and customer disputes explain the notice, preservation, and enforcement issues that follow.
What You Should Negotiate
You should spend negotiating capital on provisions that affect the actual transaction. For a data provider, security, permitted use, incident response, liability, and transition may dominate the review. For a manufacturer, specifications, forecasts, acceptance, warranty, supply continuity, and cover rights may control. For a creative services agreement, ownership, approvals, licenses, third party material, and portfolio use may present the greatest risk.
You should also compare related provisions as a system. A broad warranty provides limited protection if the exclusive remedy supplies a small credit. A termination right loses value when the provider may withhold data needed for transition. An indemnity promise may provide little recovery when the liability cap applies and insurance excludes the claim.
By reviewing the contract, you identify the obligations your business can perform, the remedies available when the other party fails, and the exposure created when either side exits. You should understand those points before signing, then administer the agreement according to the terms you negotiated.
Related practice area: Outside General Counsel
This article is general information about the law, not legal advice, and reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Laws change and how they apply depends on your specific facts. For advice on your situation, consult a qualified attorney.
Need advice tied to your business issue?
Share the issue. Get direct attorney review. Receive a concrete recommendation.
Submit an Inquiry