IP, Internet & Compliance

Domain Name Disputes

Your trademark on their URL. Not for long.

Your domain name is where customers, search engines, and email expect to find you, and a cybersquatter who registers an infringing domain can divert your traffic, run a scam under your brand's name, or hold the name for ransom. Hank has recovered hundreds of infringing domain names for Fortune 500 companies, celebrities, professional athletes, and other trademark owners, and recovery runs along one of two tracks, an administrative proceeding or a federal lawsuit, depending on how the registrant behaves and what you want back.

Most recoveries start with the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy ("UDRP"), the dispute policy every registrant agrees to when registering a domain name. Hank files complaints with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center with evidence to support the three elements the UDRP requires, that the domain is identical or confusingly similar to your trademark, that the registrant has no legitimate interest in it, and that the registrant registered and uses it in bad faith. A panel decides on the written record, with no live hearing, and orders the domain transferred or cancelled, which recovers the name in weeks rather than the months or years a lawsuit takes.

When a domain registrant hides its identity, cybersquats across multiple domains, or you want to recover monetary damages, the matter often belongs in federal court under the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act. That statute applies to anyone who registers or traffics in a domain with a bad-faith intent to profit from another's mark. A court can award statutory damages from $1,000 to $100,000 per domain, order the name transferred, and hear an in rem action against the domain itself when the registrant can't be found or served with legal process. Hank also defends the other side of these disputes, the legitimate registrant a brand owner tries to muscle off a domain it has every right to keep, where an overreaching complaint can amount to reverse domain name hijacking.

Hank has handled domain disputes for global brands protecting a trademark, public figures reclaiming their name, and registrants defending a domain they registered legitimately. Every engagement works toward the same result, the right party in control of the name, recovered through whichever forum gets it back fastest and for good.

Services Include

  • UDRP recovery at WIPO
  • ACPA cybersquatting litigation
  • In rem actions against domains
  • Typosquatting and brand-abuse claims
  • Reverse domain name hijacking defense
  • Cease-and-desist and demand letters
  • Domain portfolio and registrar disputes
  • Settlement and transfer agreements

Domain Name Disputes Insights

Reverse Domain Name Hijacking Under the UDRP

The UDRP can protect trademark owners from cybersquatting, while Rule 15(e) addresses complaints brought in bad faith to deprive registrants of domain names.

Read article

Typosquatting, Brandjacking, and Domain-Based Brand Abuse

A misspelled or deceptive domain can divert customers, imitate login pages, redirect traffic, or support fraudulent email. This article explains UDRP proceedings, ACPA claims, abuse reports, monitoring, and defensive registration.

Read article

Domain Disputes Beyond .com, New gTLDs, Country Code TLDs, and the URS

The domain extension can determine which administrative procedure applies, what a complainant must prove, and whether the available remedy is suspension or transfer.

Read article

Domain Strategy and Trademark Protection for Online Brand Security

A domain dispute often begins months before anyone files a complaint. You announce a product before acquiring the matching domain, a web developer registers the name through a personal account, or a renewal notice goes to an employee who left the company.

Read article

How the UDRP Process Works and What You Need to Prove

A trademark owner who discovers that a cybersquatter has registered a domain name incorporating the owner's mark has two primary enforcement options. One is federal litigation under the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, which is covered in a separate article.

Read article

The Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act and When to Sue in Federal Court

A domain name dispute may require more than transfer of the registration. The Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy offers a focused administrative procedure when the trademark owner seeks transfer or cancellation. It offers no damages, discovery, or injunction against registrations beyond the domains named in the complaint.

Read article

In Rem Actions Under the ACPA and How to Recover a Domain When You Can't Find the Registrant

A domain registrant may hide behind false information, a privacy service, or an address outside the United States. Those circumstances can prevent a trademark owner from identifying a defendant or establishing personal jurisdiction. The [Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=%28title%3A15+section%3A1125+edition%3Aprelim%29) addresses that problem through an in rem action against the domain name itself.

Read article

How UDRP Panels and Federal Courts Decide Bad Faith Registration and Use

Bad faith often determines the outcome of a domain dispute because similarity alone says little about why someone selected a domain.

Read article

Legitimate Interests and When a Registrant May Keep a Domain

A domain can resemble a trademark without belonging to the trademark owner.

Read article

Ready to make the right legal move?

Share the issue. Get direct attorney review. Receive a concrete recommendation.

Submit an Inquiry