Pay-When-Paid and Pay-If-Paid Clauses in Texas Construction Contracts
Owner nonpayment can mean two different things in a Texas subcontract. If your clause says the contractor pays you within a set number of days after receiving owner funds, you're usually dealing with payment timing. The contractor gets a reasonable period to collect from the owner, then you can pursue payment from the contractor if the owner never pays.
Different language changes the economics. If your subcontract makes owner payment a condition precedent and says you assume the owner nonpayment risk, Texas law treats that as a contingent payment clause. That clause can defeat your contract claim against the contractor for work the owner never funded, but only if the language and Texas Business and Commerce Code Chapter 56 line up.
Pay-When-Paid Delays Payment
A pay-when-paid clause controls timing. It tells you when payment is due after the contractor receives money from the owner, but it usually doesn't make owner payment a condition to your right to be paid.
Texas Business and Commerce Code § 56.003 leaves timing provisions alone when payment will be made within a reasonable period. That fits the ordinary pay-when-paid clause. The contractor may wait while it pursues payment from the owner, but the clause doesn't shift the owner's credit risk to you unless the subcontract uses stronger condition precedent language.
Gulf Construction Co. v. Self, 676 S.W.2d 624 (Tex. App. Corpus Christi 1984, writ refused n.r.e.), is the baseline Texas case. The subcontract said the contractor wasn't required to make payment until owner funds were advanced or paid. The court treated that language as a timing covenant, not a condition precedent, because the subcontract didn't unambiguously transfer the owner insolvency risk to the subcontractors.
Sheldon L. Pollack Corp. v. Falcon Industries, Inc., 794 S.W.2d 380 (Tex. App. Corpus Christi 1990, writ denied), applied the same distinction. Payment language tied to owner or lender funding affected timing, not ultimate liability. For a subcontractor, the difference is money, because a timing clause delays collection while a true condition precedent can defeat it.
Pay-If-Paid Shifts Owner Nonpayment Risk
A pay-if-paid clause makes owner payment a condition precedent to contractor payment. If the owner doesn't pay for your work, the contractor argues that its obligation to pay you never matured.
Texas courts require unambiguous language before they treat owner payment as a condition precedent. Criswell v. European Crossroads Shopping Center, Ltd., 792 S.W.2d 945 (Tex. 1990), stated the broader contract rule. Courts avoid finding a condition precedent when another reasonable reading exists because forfeitures are disfavored.
FaulknerUSA, LP v. Alaron Supply Co., No. 08-09-00119-CV, 2010 WL 2867325 (Tex. App. El Paso July 28, 2010, no pet.), shows what stronger language looks like. The subcontract said owner payment was a condition precedent, said the subcontractor was entitled to payment only for work the owner funded, said the subcontractor assumed the risk of owner nonpayment, and said the clause shouldn't be construed as a time-of-payment clause. The court held that language was an enforceable, express condition precedent and reversed a summary judgment the supplier won below.
You should look for that level of precision. Words like "after," "when," and "upon receipt" usually speak to timing. Words like "condition precedent," "contingent upon," "only to the extent paid by owner," and "subcontractor assumes the risk of nonpayment" give the contractor a stronger pay-if-paid argument.
Chapter 56 Limits Contingent Payment Clauses
Chapter 56 calls a pay-if-paid provision a contingent payment clause. The statute applies when a construction management contract, construction contract, or materials contract makes the contractor's receipt of payment from another person a condition precedent to paying the contingent payee.
Chapter 56 covers both private projects and some public projects. It excludes contracts solely for design services, certain civil engineering work such as roads, bridges, utilities, water and wastewater facilities, wharves, docks, airport runways, and drainage projects, and improvements to or construction of a detached single-family residence, duplex, triplex, or quadruplex.
You can't contract around Chapter 56. Section 56.004 makes a purported waiver void. Section 56.056 also makes the contingent payment clause an affirmative defense, which means the contractor or surety must assert and prove it when you sue for payment.
Contractor Fault Changes the Result
Under § 56.051, a contractor or surety may not enforce a contingent payment clause to the extent owner nonpayment resulted from the contractor's failure to meet its own contractual obligations. That exception disappears when the owner withheld payment because you failed to meet your subcontract requirements.
That rule applies most often when the owner refuses to pay for reasons outside your scope. If the contractor failed to submit a compliant pay application, missed closeout requirements, caused defective work in another trade, or breached the prime contract, the contractor shouldn't be able to use its own failure as the reason you don't get paid. You should connect the owner's stated basis for nonpayment to the party responsible for that problem.
A contractor or surety also loses enforcement in two other situations. Section 56.053 applies when the contractor has a sham relationship with the obligor under Texas Property Code § 53.026. Section 56.054 applies when enforcement would be unconscionable, although the party asserting unconscionability bears the burden of proving it.
The Objection Notice Has Real Timing Rules
Section 56.052 provides a statutory objection procedure after an unpaid payment request ages long enough. You may send written notice objecting to further enforcement only after the 45th day after you submit a written payment request that substantially follows your subcontract's progress payment or invoice requirements.
Once effective, the notice cuts off enforcement as to work performed or materials delivered after the effective date. The statute sets that effective date as the latest of the 10th day after the contractor receives the notice, the eighth day after prompt payment interest begins to accrue on a private project under Property Code § 28.004 or on a federal project under the federal prompt payment statute, or the 11th day after interest begins to accrue on a state or local public project under Government Code § 2251.025.
Contractors have a response right when the owner's payment dispute resulted from your failure to meet your contractual requirements. The contractor's written response must reach you by the later of the fifth day before your notice becomes effective or the fifth day after the contractor receives your notice. On public projects, Chapter 56 also preserves enforcement to the extent funds are uncollectible because of a primary obligor's successful sovereign immunity defense, but only after the contractor exhausts its contract and Chapter 2251 remedies.
Payment reinstates the clause for subsequent work. When you receive the unpaid amount that gave rise to the objection notice, the contingent payment clause applies again to work performed or materials furnished after that payment, subject to Chapter 56.
Lien Rights Run on a Separate Track
Section 56.055 protects mechanic's lien rights. A contingent payment clause may not be used as a basis for invalidating the enforceability or perfection of a mechanic's lien under Texas Property Code Chapter 53.
That protection has a defined scope. It protects mechanic's liens, so you should keep sending monthly notices, file the lien affidavit on time, and preserve statutory retainage arguments on private projects. Chapter 56 doesn't give you permission to ignore the lien calendar, because your contract claim and your lien claim run on different tracks.
Public project bond claims need separate attention. Chapter 56 regulates enforcement by a contingent payor or surety in several places, but § 56.055 speaks specifically to mechanic's liens. On a public project, you should preserve payment bond notices and deadlines even if you're also objecting under Chapter 56.
Prompt Payment Rules Affect the Clause
On private projects, Texas Property Code § 28.002 requires an owner to pay a contractor within 35 days after receiving a proper written payment request for properly performed work, suitably stored materials, or specially fabricated materials. A contractor who receives owner payment must pay the subcontractor's share within seven days. Unpaid amounts accrue interest at 1.5% per month under § 28.004, and § 28.006 makes most waivers void.
A true pay-if-paid clause can affect when the downstream payment obligation arises, because the contractor says owner payment was a condition precedent. It can't extend the payment deadline after the contractor receives the owner's money for your work. Once the contractor has the funds attributable to your scope, Chapter 28's seven-day rule takes over.
On public projects, Government Code Chapter 2251 sets the public prompt payment framework. A governmental entity's payment is generally overdue on the 31st day after the later of receiving the goods, completion of the service, or receiving the invoice. A vendor that receives payment from a governmental entity must pay the subcontractor's proper share within 10 days.
Read the Clause Before You Price the Job
You should decide what the payment clause does before you price the work. If the subcontract only delays payment until owner funds arrive, you're pricing contractor credit risk for a reasonable collection period. If the subcontract shifts owner nonpayment to you, you're pricing the owner's credit risk too.
You should ask for the information Chapter 56 makes relevant. On a private project, that includes owner information, a legally sufficient property description, payment bond information if a bond exists, loan amount and loan terms if the project is financed, any foreseeable default statement, borrower and lender information, and available funds information if loan proceeds won't cover the full contract amount. On a public project, that includes the contracting authority, payment bond information, and a statement that funds are available and authorized for the full contract amount when Chapter 56 makes it relevant.
If you accept a pay-if-paid clause, you should track three separate systems from day one. Track your payment applications for the Chapter 56 objection date, track lien or bond deadlines independently, and track prompt payment dates once money begins flowing through the payment chain.
For contractors, the drafting lesson is equally direct. If you intend to shift owner nonpayment risk, the subcontract must say so in condition precedent language and must account for Chapter 56. A clause that only says payment comes after owner payment buys time. It won't reliably transfer the loss.
Related practice area: Construction Law & Litigation
This article is general information about the law, not legal advice, and reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Laws change and how they apply depends on your specific facts. For advice on your situation, consult a qualified attorney.
Need advice tied to your business issue?
Share the issue. Get direct attorney review. Receive a concrete recommendation.
Submit an Inquiry